Saying Russiagate govt reports and press coverage aren't good enough is not engaging in conspiracy theories.
-
-
That's where skeptics aren't convinced by what's available, while some investigators may be motivated to arrive at pre-defined answers.
-
Skeptical experts say available facts can be interpreted broadly enough to point to different actors not necessarily in Kremlin or Russia.
-
Also, simplifying "more sources" argument:few sources in 2004 - wrong consensus,more sources in 2016 - right consensus?Could still be wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.