Thought on @shadowbrokerss post: they can claim to leak to subscribers, but who is going to admit having paid and having access? 1/n
Actually @RosenzweigP & @jacklgoldsmith might have interesting comments on legal status of theft of NSA toys they won't admit are NSA toys.
-
-
Do not know of any cases involving charges against purchasers for receipt of stolen property. Would be novel case, IMHO /5 =end=
-
I would like to see a case where a company affected by a derivative exploit kit sues US govt and its contractors for copyright infringement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Classic case of graymail akin to many other cases involving alleged theft of classified info /4
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can be done in court using CIPA procedures, but likely results in eventual public acknowledgement, which USG may wish/prefer not to do /3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But proving they are stolen requires admitting they are USG property/developed and classified /2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All US works are not public domain. In fact most are not. /1
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.