I admit USG published statements saying they were certain. Relevant officials' interviews/testimonies are a bit all over the place.
Still logical gibberish. You were wrong. Please stop.https://twitter.com/zezezebe/status/882926563238465537 …
-
-
Which part of that statement is wrong? Are you objecting to the word "speculation" to describe USG statement met with some skepticism?
-
Yes. You're projecting your own speculation onto people who aren't actually speculating.
-
"Speculate - form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence". Until the firm evidence is public, I'll keep the wording.
-
Right. You don't have evidence. Ergo you're speculating. I have more than you. I'm not. Govt has far more. They're not.
-
To sum up: "A lot of people with actual evidence are speculating but I have none and therefore I'm not speculating."
-
Not true.I can't say whether they have actual evidence/how good it is,I'm not claiming to not be speculating.
-
"I assume the people with sensors in Putin's underwear drawer are speculating which makes my speculation just like theirs."
-
This argument sums up to "government knows better" - combined with what we know about past intel blunders, doesn't look good.
- 22 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.