"Political pressure" is one potential bridge between unreliable sources/evidence not definitive enough and strongly worded statements.
Then this entire thread is for nought bc that's all it was premised on, which you originally got all bothered about, but ultimately conceded
-
-
I think here's where disconnect happened:what I called speculation you called uniform USG belief.Not mutually exclusive,belief may be wrong.
-
Those two tweets were utter and complete logic gibberish. Try again.
-
I said we had speculation,you said we had USG belief.Then we moved to govt dissent,when IMO point is basis for belief beyond speculation.
-
Still logical gibberish. You were wrong. Please stop. https://twitter.com/zezezebe/status/882926563238465537 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Which part of that statement is wrong? Are you objecting to the word "speculation" to describe USG statement met with some skepticism?
-
Yes. You're projecting your own speculation onto people who aren't actually speculating.
-
"Speculate - form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence". Until the firm evidence is public, I'll keep the wording.
-
Right. You don't have evidence. Ergo you're speculating. I have more than you. I'm not. Govt has far more. They're not.
- 26 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.