And your response--that it didn't matter to him--further backs my assertion.
In any case one reason I concern myself with it is 1) it's my beat 2) I think I can offer a middle ground bt baseless speculation & evidence
-
-
But I'd also add, I don't understand why Moscow's defenders pretend a hack is outside the norm in state spying.
-
I am not a "Moscow defender" Don't think hacking outside norms I see zero evidence of DNC or Clinton hacking or Russian election involvement
-
I'm telling you I have seen such evidence. I don't expect you to trust me on faith, but do not doubt I know of it.
-
Also, apologize for calling you a Moscow defender.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.