I don't do any analysis in this post or other translation posts. You're correct, but I don't want to content (much) here. Just translate
-
-
Replying to @thegrugq @MalwareJake
I'll add your tweets here as footnotes to the section, if you are ok with that?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @thegrugq
Fine by me. FWIW I know this is consistent with your previous translations, but you're likely to get more hits than their original post.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MalwareJake
Yeah, I don't know what to do about that. I want to make them accessible to infosec people who don't speak native English.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
I have nothing but respect for you and your work. Totally understand the intent.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MalwareJake
Added your response btw. I agree w/ your assessment, you made the right call. When I write my analysis I'll explain your impossible position
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @thegrugq
If they dump what I think they have, it's gonna get a lot less fun in a jiffy...
5 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @MalwareJake
impossible to predict, but thanks for the pessimism! I'm cautiously optimistic that they won't dump "data" w/o provocation.
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @thegrugq @MalwareJake
Are you certain you know what SB considers a provocation?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @thegrugq
Right. Hence my original one word reply "provocation"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Great minds yadda yadda.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.