Anything short of an apology is still you embracing active misinformation, precisely what you claim to oppose.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I think you are misunderstanding me. Yes, the article is from April 28th and you immediately did an analysis. Good job and take care.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NAKU2014
No. I'm not. You're trying to pretend you didn't make a kneejerk response when someone tried to correct misinformation. Don't condescend.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NAKU2014
Again--this is VERY important--you claim to oppose misinfo. But you endorse it if it helps you. You are the problem you claim to fight.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
N Aku Retweeted Michael McFaul
Not misinformation. Ambassador
@McFaul stated it better yesterday.https://twitter.com/McFaul/status/881957088246718465 …N Aku added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
N Aku Retweeted Michael McFaul
N Aku added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
WOWEEE. You mean it's possible to convey that this came out two months ago w/o misinforming people? Still waiting on that apology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NAKU2014
Again. This is VERY simple. You claim to oppose misinfo, except you kneejerk protect it when it serves your goals. That's corrupt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I have no idea what you're talking about. Misinformation has nothing to do with a date of an article. I agree with much of your analysis
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NAKU2014
Yes. You apparently don't understand that linking a 2 month old story claiming it is new is misinformation. So you're dumb, not corrupt?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't give a flying fuck whether you agree w/my analysis, as I think you're stupid. I DO care that you accused me of suppressing this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.