If you RT it w/o changing the language that suggests it is new, then you are propagating misinformation, which apparently you endorse.
No. I'm not. You're trying to pretend you didn't make a kneejerk response when someone tried to correct misinformation. Don't condescend.
-
-
Again--this is VERY important--you claim to oppose misinfo. But you endorse it if it helps you. You are the problem you claim to fight.
-
Not misinformation. Ambassador
@McFaul stated it better yesterday.https://twitter.com/McFaul/status/881957088246718465 … -
WOWEEE. You mean it's possible to convey that this came out two months ago w/o misinforming people? Still waiting on that apology.
-
Again. This is VERY simple. You claim to oppose misinfo, except you kneejerk protect it when it serves your goals. That's corrupt.
-
I have no idea what you're talking about. Misinformation has nothing to do with a date of an article. I agree with much of your analysis
-
Yes. You apparently don't understand that linking a 2 month old story claiming it is new is misinformation. So you're dumb, not corrupt?
-
I don't give a flying fuck whether you agree w/my analysis, as I think you're stupid. I DO care that you accused me of suppressing this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.