Folks RTing this? It dates to April.https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/881899573156990978 …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
What's your point? Just b/c it's from the end of April it shouldn't be discussed?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NAKU2014
Um. Some of us discussed it when it was "for the first time." Please don't make up things.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
Making things up? Strange comment. My point is that any discussion/awareness is good, no matter if it's not news to you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NAKU2014
I'm sorry. Suggesting that my pointing out misinformation about whether this is NEW amounts to not wanting to discuss it is irresponsible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @NAKU2014
So wallow in misinformation if you want. But please don't suggest I'm suppressing information when I'm clarifying it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Yes, the article was from April 28. Are you not allowed to RT an old piece? Anyway... https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/facebook-and-information-operations-v1.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NAKU2014
If you RT it w/o changing the language that suggests it is new, then you are propagating misinformation, which apparently you endorse.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @NAKU2014
And thank you for the fucking link I used to write a long piece on this in April. You're such a help.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
It's literally the title of the article. I like some of your analysis, but this is strange. People should read the report if they haven't
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is also LITERALLY misinformation. Again, you're endorsing people be misinformed. You are part of the problem you claim to fight.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.