The "source" (if there is one at all) is very likely Kushner. Or Trump himself.
-
-
-
Yup. Neither of whom has a very good reason to demand anonymity except "gotta prevent you from proving I'm lying."
-
Completely unethical and wouldn't be allowed at a real news outlet. But, as you say, Fox aint that.
-
I think Bloomberg had a similar Trump anon denial recently. The habit is leaching beyond Fox.
-
I worked for Bloomberg when they had among the most rigorous standards in the business. No fooling. A pity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They didn't say the source wasn't Trump
-
There's a good chance it is him. But what's the basis for anonymity here, then? He can't get fired for this "leak."
-
It's to allow him to get his propaganda out & covers Fox's ass about a source
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And a reporter willing to stand by a byline.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
According Sarah Huckabee Sanders, anon sources are destroying the country, so you need to make sure you don't use more than one per story.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or, y'know, a real byline.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I still remember when reporters use to record all their calls.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“That which can B asserted w/o evidence can B dismissed without evidence.”Christopher Hitchens
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Counterpoint: If Scarborough has proof as he claims for Grid's sake publish it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.