Of course, we already know answer to Q whether govt would fess up if its weaponized anthrax were used in a terrorist attack. Nope.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Well, you can have biological weapons, what else are you going to call them, computer exploits developed by war fighters?
-
Also note the slippage between "vulnerability" and "exploit" (regrettably due to Brad Smith's use of the former when he meant the latter).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A weapon is ANYTHING used to harm another. A lie. My shoe. A stick. Why wouldn't an exploit be considered a weapon?
-
All the more true given that US is calling leaked documents weaponized leaks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A better distinction maybe that weapons directly cause physical harm to people. Harm to people from exploits would be remote, non-direct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do bacteria exploit vulnerabilities in human immune system? Are vaccines a patch? Anthrax invades, replicates; compares well w/ exploit kit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.