Redactions made it really difficult to establish (v. conclude) which is prob. why not mentioned in case (yet). timeline however clear here:https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/879396856538820609 …
-
-
Replying to @K_interarma
"which quoted from Yoo’s July 13, 2002 fax to Rizzo" What's hard about that. I'll grant you I'm the only one who actually READ that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
As I said in first thread, and later, establishing it before a court has a much higher threshold. Not critical of reporting work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @K_interarma
Thank you. I'm familiar with how court works. You made a comment that was inconsistent with the public record, which is why I raised it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
My comment is also the one listed in the ACLU description of their own deposition. That's a severe accusation, hence why I responded.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure precisely what you mean there. I was simply correcting on the public record (which admittedly many lawyers have not read).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.