One of the reasons B E N G H A Zhitzhow I turned into such a mess was bc Gang of 4 were acting as cut-outs. It blew up.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a different case. Bipartisan statement was needed to minimize political fallout. Where could BHO find Rs w/ clearance 2 be briefed?
-
No. Nope. Nope. We are a fucking democracy. The Gang of 8 is about oversight, not serving as intelligence cutout.
-
There should be no scenario where the IC is unwilling to back its intelligence and instead asks these overseers to go back it instead.
-
So, given lack of consensus in IC at the time, no public statements warranted? (Not saying that's a bad thing, just trying to clarify.)
-
There was consensus on some points. Not on whether RU state was hacking election sites.
-
Also consensus that sites were targeted by someone. IMHO a limited statement stronger than the one McConnell later approved was warranted.
-
What's your evidence for that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.