WaPo has done a very good job of claiming Mitch McConnell was evil for not making a statement that preceded IC attribution last fall.
-
-
As I understand timeline, McConnell disagreed with the intelligence well after the IC had reached this conclusion. Why do you choose 7 Oct?
-
Because that's when IC issued a statement? Nope. All the WaPo details on public statement are September. September is b4 October, right?
-
Not interested in when they issued statement. Interested in when they told McConnell "the Russians what did it." He seems hard to persuade.
-
Ok. Well, again, I'm actually affirmatively uncomfortable with expecting MoCs to get ahead of public IC attribution. They're not cutouts.
-
That gives him (and others) an enormous amount of cover for behaving tribally when in their short term interests.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But other choice also problematic. IC puts thumb on scale. If MM had bona fide objctn, fine. But nobody believes he held a bona fide objctn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it's the "crime of the century" ! Let's do something quickly !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.