One Q in my piece on WaPo's magnum opus: Why was Lisa Monaco, John Brennan's successor, excluded fr 1st briefing? https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/06/23/the-compartments-in-wapos-russian-hack-opus/ …
-
-
Finally, how in piece threatening looming cyberattack on RU do you remain silent abt apparent ongoing cyber attach by Shadow Brokers here?
-
Qs not asked: If "looming" cyberattack on RU has in fact been undertaken, act of war? If so, used Article II to bypass WPR & no AUMF?
-
You and your quaint belief in AUMFs again.
-
Dreaming of a time gone by that never really existed? That would be me. :-)
-
Like I said, quaint.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also Kaspersky doesn't make deals with US Intel and LE to "not notice" certain footprints.
-
Yeah, that's precisely my point. Sanctioning them may have more to do with expanding asymmetry on AV visibility into US actions.
-
Agree. Guess I was mostly cheerleading the analysis. You make a good collateral point: Is that asymmetry also used for domestic obfuscation?
-
Probably.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
P.R. disaster to go after Kaspersky, who's one of the few non-dissident big name Russians respected in the west.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Anti-virus is a reconnaissance tool in the hands of an Intel service. The fact that Kaspersky exists in RU means they get special attention.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.