No. I'm talking about the actual evidence, which I've written about extensively. You're talking abt claims presented in indictment.
Arguing absent actual evidence of transmission of classified info & 3 other poss suspects & facts Sterling may not have had=reasonable doubt
-
-
Are you arguing the standard in this country isn't supposed to be reasonable doubt?
-
Or are you arguing, we need a head and Sterling is the most likely one so chop that one off?
-
I think we both know when you are given access to classified materials you give up some of the freedoms your fellow citizens have.
-
That's a straw man. You don't give up the freedom to have non-classified conversations.
-
You dont, but if a reporter you are having non-classified conversations with writes a book with classified information you are screwed.
-
Yes. This establishes standard that providing unclassified tips is sufficient to send you to prison. I find that utterly objectionable.
-
Then you should be offended that those 3 charges were upheld. I might support the other ones (for the book). But not the unwritten NYT story
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.