LOL at the I Con the Record redaction of date in a doc that says, We then received yesterday, August 26.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
But it could been any number of different August 27ths.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
Except they gave the year and the doc is very clearly abt the first FAA auth. Other than that, sure!
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I was being facetious. But you're right. A lot of problematic over-redactions in many of these docs.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings
They're there for the lawyers. If the July 2010 Bates opinion had its date shown EFF's job would be far easier.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pwnallthethings
But of course, every time they hide a date it's a big red sign for me personally saying THIS DATE IS LEGALLY IMPORTANT.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
So I'm grateful for that big flag, like NSA is likely grateful for certain kinds of encryption to ID the good stuff.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.