LOL at the I Con the Record redaction of date in a doc that says, We then received yesterday, August 26.
-
-
I was being facetious. But you're right. A lot of problematic over-redactions in many of these docs.
-
They're there for the lawyers. If the July 2010 Bates opinion had its date shown EFF's job would be far easier.
-
But of course, every time they hide a date it's a big red sign for me personally saying THIS DATE IS LEGALLY IMPORTANT.
-
So I'm grateful for that big flag, like NSA is likely grateful for certain kinds of encryption to ID the good stuff.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.