Okay, in response to a few questions: take this "39-states-hacked" story with a grain of salt for now ... https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections …
-
-
Replying to @RidT
First off, the headline starts with "Russian Cyber Hacks ..." That instantly makes me suspicious of some editors & their attention to detail
7 replies 14 retweets 30 likes -
Replying to @RidT
Then: the story is all over the place —Illinois investigation —Link to Florida via Winner leak —"39 breaches" —"red phone" —& known fluffpic.twitter.com/RaRuMWUuFi
3 replies 14 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @RidT
Three entirely anonymous sources and vague references to "evidence." That's just not good enough.pic.twitter.com/9t5OwcQYs9
6 replies 28 retweets 38 likes -
Replying to @RidT
Also: as early as 15 June 2016 it was completely clear the 2016 op was an active measure, so clearly "more than a mere spying mission."
1 reply 10 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @RidT
Q is now: did APT28—or others—try to take election interference beyond active measures into messing with actual voting procedures? And how?
5 replies 12 retweets 29 likes
Q I've seen no one address (except for me & someone closer to hacks than us) is why we're sure RU didn't tamper w/Hillary's analytics
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.