Simpler: On 3/2, DOJ wasn't publicly saying if there even was a Russia (+links to Trump camp asscts) invest; 3/2 wording reflected coyness
-
-
-
Why 3/2 and not 5/9?
-
Oh. The recusal? Except the statement written on Thursday reiterates that it's only about the election.
-
Lilely derivative of wording used in early March tho
-
Why? If there was a memo fr March, it'd have been released. Moreover, it's possible under recent strain w/Trump Sessions is moving the ball.
-
bc easiest/safest to recycle previously approved wording rather than craft something new when they are still being coy
-
How are they being coy? This was clearly an attempt to respond to Comey's testimony and it clearly departs from his on this critical point.
-
Not coy: "it was for that reason, and that reason alone, the Attorney General made the decision on March 2, 2017 to recuse himself "
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
IIRC the Steele memos alleged Page would get brokerage fees (around $200m by my estimate) from the sale of 19% of Rosneft, not stock itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.