FISA amicus initially an advocate. Weakened in final bill, albeit opened up to include technical expertise. No tech expert ever designated.
-
-
Replying to @astepanovich
As I noted in my post,
@SteveBellovin was all cleared for PCLOB, could have been used for upstream opinion. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/05/30/the-problems-with-rosemary-collyers-shitty-upstream-702-opinion/ …3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @astepanovich @SteveBellovin
Right. Bc convo should reflect info in that "It's Complicated" paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @SteveBellovin
Generally I don't trust the FISC judges to fully grasp much of anything technical.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich @SteveBellovin
Collyer clearly didn't, but we don't know if it's bc DOJ misinformed her or bc she's dumb.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @SteveBellovin
I don't think those are only two options. Tech can be hard, you don't have to be dumb to not understand it, but it's bad not to have help
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
No, not only two. But she REALLY didn't understand. (But in ways that mirror non-disclosures of USG in the past).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.