The FBI doesn't use black ink when it redacts documents.
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @JasonLeopold
Curious to see if Fbi publicly says it's not real, since last we heard they didn't believe in rebutting fake documents
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DevlinBarrett @emptywheel
It's such a crude cut and paste job. I can't imagine they would even bother
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JasonLeopold @emptywheel
Agree tho I think there's an unanswered q in all this - how much of public debate do USG agencies concede to bs conspiracy theories
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @JasonLeopold
For many conspiracy theories, USG could publicly refute if they choose, but often choose not to on the theory doing so only fuels theory...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DevlinBarrett @JasonLeopold
Sure, but a lot of conspiracy theories arise in the vacuum created by govt secrecy (cf 9/11).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JasonLeopold
Totally, that's why I think it's dangerous to say nothing. But also covered the NIST probe of WTC collapse. Jet fuel vs steel beams, sigh.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh, not defending the conspiracies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.