We do?
-
-
Confused by this. Thought Flynn assumed his call intercepts would be minimized, didn't realize he was under FISA warrant. Am I being dense?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
I don't think Flynn himself was named in a FISA warrant. My impression is they went after exes like Page to avoid politicization.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
There was an exchange at the Yates hearing that suggested he was under FISA warrant IIRC.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Very interesting, I missed that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll try to dig it up later. But I also think that's the only read of this section of the Reuters story from last night.pic.twitter.com/CfrjwL8A7N
4 replies 6 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @brianbeutler @peter_cazar and
Here’s the exchange that tipped me off Flynn was subject of FISA warrant, w/ screen grabs of transcript for context. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4671610 pic.twitter.com/ux1husJROZ
5 replies 9 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @brianbeutler @peter_cazar and
I think you are confusing Title I FISA and Section 702 FISA here.
2 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @brianbeutler and
MoCs are. As you likely know in every hearing they say, "OMIGOSH Kislyak intercept so we can't reauth 702." Dummies. But I'll take it.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @brianbeutler and
Right, though I think second "unknown" questioner is trying to clarify the distinction. But nothing here to indicate Flynn was FISA target.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Yup. Some version of this has happened at every hearing this year. Dummies dummies dummies.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.