For months we've wondered why Flynn wld talk on unsecured, monitored channels with Kislyak. We have our answer.
-
-
Right, though I think second "unknown" questioner is trying to clarify the distinction. But nothing here to indicate Flynn was FISA target.
-
Unknown was Sen. Whitehouse.
-
And Whitehouse, who's a surveillance hawk & actually knows this stuff, was trying to help his stupid colleagues understand Kislyak = Title I
-
But even with--especially with--Title I, FBI would have all that content sitting on a server to come up when an Agent searches on Mike Flynn
-
And you think this bit here specifically is bad?https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/868532336769605632 …
-
Well, it would certainly facilitate a CI investigation, which is why it's like that. But I'm a hippie so would like a few more protections.
-
Fair.
-
Incidentally, FBI used to have 3rd party protections (which you may know about). They no longer do. It's all just on a server for searching.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.