The reason why the paragraph is so wrong is bc the underlying Circa reporting is shitty.
-
-
-
I was positively surprised by your take until I saw this. That Circa reporting was a huge deal in RW media yesterday.
-
Yeah. This is a real issue. But Circa's FISA reporting has been consistently atrocious.
-
For some strange reason I had an unexplained reflexive faith in Circa's reporting. Hope you have an explainer somewhere.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is the 2011 rule change it refers to? The unmasking change? How'd that change # of intercepts? Is that just a nonsensical sentence?
-
1) Pretend they didn't use the word intercepts bc they're not referring to intercepts 2) Ignore unmasking bc it doesn't refer to unmasking
-
3) The rule change is "back door searches" but their numbers are wrong 4) Not all of this is back door searches
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Go on...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this damage control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.