taking over the domain would be the hacking back. not registering it makes the argument over who "owns" it cleaner, still could be disputed
-
-
Replying to @daviottenheimer
No, registering an unregistered domain is not anything covered by the Graves bill, it is perfectly legal today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lippard
yeah, easy choice. nobody claimed authority of the pump handle so you take it off. now someone claims authority. you take it off anyway
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer
Not clear to me Graves bill would permit that, nor that it would be better to permit that by private party vs govt action.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lippard
many reasons why better to use private ingenuity in open market instead of a bureaucratic reflex. it's why cloud instead of cold or hot site
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer
Not sure legislation is necessary to enable that. If so, it needs to include a requirement that it was infeasible to get owner cooperation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lippard
infeasible leaves a ton open to interpretation: did you try and find them incompetent, incoherent, incapable, insouciant...
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @daviottenheimer
There's a v2.0 of the Graves bill--it looks much, much better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lippard @daviottenheimer
link? Can we still name it after ACDC songs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.