Why would you try to restart the attack this way rather than releasing a working exploit that doesn't have the killswitch?https://twitter.com/a_greenberg/status/865616240123031553 …
-
-
Botnets are cheap enough that it makes sense to try and take out the killswitch while working on a new exploit without one.
-
As good an explanation as any I guess. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think you stumbled on the answer
-
We're actually watching a race between multiple entities to see who can set the world on fire first, aren't we?
-
Thankfully most of them are incompetent
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Removing the kill switch might require some coding skill. It's so much easier for a loser script kiddie to run a canned script to blast away
-
That's actually one reason I'm asking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Major evidence trail at halfway point between here and Russia?
-
Not sure what you mean?
-
Hacks come out day after major developments on Russia investigation? The attack started in Russia from incidence maps. Our work or theirs?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The lulz, its all for the lulz.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.