for some strange reason, I get the sense it isn't the Russia hack that Sessions is all that exercised about.
-
-
Replying to @matthewamiller
Nitty-gritty would be Boente at EDVA & now NSD tho
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @matthewamiller
You're assuming it hasn't already happened?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewamiller
No, I don't know TBH. But even if it already has, if there's a Russia 2016 hook, doesn't that mean Mueller now owns it?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @matthewamiller
1) Not by my read, https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/05/17/the-scope-of-the-special-counsel-appointment-is-totally-inadequate/ … 2) Not if they're indicting for Snowden related stuff
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
3) You're more likely than I to be able to get clarification whether Mueller can cover anything outside of scope of Sessions' narrow recusal
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Adding, even if they do have evidence to merit a RU-related indictment they may want to keep that secret for now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewamiller
It seems inevitable Mueller is going to have to coordinate a lot with Boente anyway. Scope of his mandate/autonomy definitely very ambiguouspic.twitter.com/hCiYqydw0w
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @matthewamiller
Boente as Acting NSD or Boente as USA for District investigating Assange?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Which then raising questions abt value of Mueller over prior status quo save 1) reassure FBI 2) devoted attention.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.