Wheeler'd
-
-
-
The HOTTEST take.
-
Wheeler gotta Wheeler
-
Go with what you know, right?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Regarding scope, doesn't ii and iii leave things pretty open? Not sure what iii means.
-
Not by my read. Remember how Fitz had to get approval even to include journalists in Plame. But also reverse direction than I'm thinking of.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does this give you any concerns on the Jared front?https://twitter.com/PhilipRucker/status/864966049019695104 …
-
Uh, yeah, that's a huge problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation" cover everything you call out?
-
I don't think so. That would be a tentacle out to include other issues. It would not cover strings into the mother ship.
-
Wow, that is concerning. But great insight!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
iii) covers obstruction https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.4 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At best, DAG was being cautious to avoid any appearance of overreach. Still a bit troubling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ha, I did write these 2 tweets before I saw your post https://twitter.com/joanneleon/status/864975925632524288 …https://twitter.com/joanneleon/status/864976374372724736 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.