Yup. Original poll delivered nice quadlemma. This does not. But I think such quadlemmas make VEP debates more interesting. @Susan_Hennessey
-
-
1. for safety critical systems i blame society for accepting insecure OSes in safety critical infra
-
2. i blame the system implementers. We have PEs who face personal criminal liability for bridges failing, why not computer security?
-
3. people are literally dying because natsec chose that offense will always win and now EHRs are inaccessible, let alone billing.
-
4. we need to reverse polarity on offense vs defense funding. 90% defense.
-
p.s. if EHRs, safety critical infra used existing CC EAL 6+ OSes like Green Hills Integrity none of this would have happened.
-
using insecure OSes in safety applications is akin to our hollowing our our autarky for Chinese slave produced goods, getting shoddy product
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.