2) Govt presented no evidence Hal Martin SHARED stolen NSA docs. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/02/08/us-indicts-hal-martin-but-offers-no-hint-hes-the-source-for-shadow-brokers-or-anyone-else/ …
-
-
-
3) NSA/CIA didn't respond to Manning/Snowden by plugging security holes. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/02/08/how-hal-martin-stole-75-of-nsas-hacking-tools-nsa-failed-to-implement-required-security-fixes-for-three-years-after-snowden/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That is the most unuseful article I've ever read, so maybe there's a reason that didn't come up.
-
I'd love a nuanced discussion of insider threat. But yeah. That's not it. That said, civ libs making similarly unuseful VEP args now.
-
I meant yours. It's literally a discussion of a count that was excluded for being irrelevant, from another irrelevant number.
-
Oh. Then it's a great way to prove the underlying number--which
@AmyZegart was using--is also bogus. That too subtle for you? -
If we're going to be alarmist abt stuff that 1) hasn't been published and 2) report ALSO provided evidence got destroyed, > focus on blanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.