Regular reminder: Wikileaks is not Wikipedia
Sure. But it's not that I disagree with you. It's that you have not--even remotely--addressed my point.
-
-
You are trying to justify Wikileaks sharing fakes that undermine a candidate just before an election.Nothing justifies that
-
Really? Nope. I'm trying to clarify what metrics actually measure. And that metric doesn't measure pro-WL shares.
-
Maybe I read a different article.Ur piece tries justifying WKL by asking for factual accuracy when addressing their role in the
#MacronLeaks -
My piece doesn't try to "justify" WL. It says idiots who invent things abt WL are actually sowing confusion, just like Putin (allegedly) is.
-
Maybe you can't read French,but
@libe article that I posted on my 1st tweet responding yours, is factually accuratehttps://twitter.com/shababaty/status/861386214422827012 …
-
Or maybe you're such a fucking idiot you don't understand my point is consistent with that article. GAWD your dumb.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Huh. Can you quote the passage?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.