In which @emptywheel explains "Why Accuracy about Wikileaks Matters." https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/05/07/why-accuracy-about-wikileaks-matters/ …
-
-
It is theSubstance that is relevant,in this case the point being the deliberate intended harm,via fakes,toward Macron,the rest is irrelevant
-
Actually, that's precisely where you don't understand what you're talking about. But again, keep showing you don't understand this.
-
I know exactly what I'm talking about.I'm from Ecuador,w an authoritarian regime-endorsed byAssange-which censorsReal Info &propagates FAKES
-
The fact that U don't agree with someone,doesn't mean that they know what they are talking about.They just have a different opinion than U
-
Sure. But it's not that I disagree with you. It's that you have not--even remotely--addressed my point.
-
You are trying to justify Wikileaks sharing fakes that undermine a candidate just before an election.Nothing justifies that
-
Really? Nope. I'm trying to clarify what metrics actually measure. And that metric doesn't measure pro-WL shares.
-
Maybe I read a different article.Ur piece tries justifying WKL by asking for factual accuracy when addressing their role in the
#MacronLeaks - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.