Yes. I'm saying the same thing as FBI Director and I'm fearmongering.
It's a shitty story. But what it is referring to is numbers in this report that refer to back door searches. https://www.dni.gov/files/icotr/ic_transparecy_report_cy2016_5_2_17.pdf …
-
-
"What he really meant was not what he said but something completely different". But it's your fault for not getting it.
-
Well, 1) The numbers Circa uses are for back door searches, not masking 2) The court decision they refer to are for back door searches.
-
34k in the article? What is the 106k you use from? And the article doesn't state that from what I gather. But I'll reread.
-
106K is the number of foreigners' data they're searching in (actually smaller at FBI & CIA). SO Gmail, Yahoo, FB content of 106 people.
-
But not 106k US citizens?
-
Nope. How many US citizens communications will be caught up in 106K full data streams?
-
Caught up, but again, how many are searched illegally without a warrant or unmasked? Usually only the gatherer has unmasked intel
-
FISC has approved these searches; they're considered legal but Congress may change that. But 5,000 USPs were searched on w/o a warrant.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But that seems to have little to nothing to do with story Rand Paul refers too that you defend from people saying Rand Paul doesn't get it
-
P.s. I will read that in a few min, not dodging it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.