Yeah. So are a lot of people. My Q is what distinguishes WL going thru them from me or you?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @BiellaColeman
Mateo Retweeted WikiLeaks
Tweets like this appear as pathetic efforts to serve their suspected far right bidders.https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/860846823229059072 …
Mateo added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattaknox @BiellaColeman
Not sure I understand how that one does. Perhaps earlier claim it hadn't found any fakes is.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @BiellaColeman
As a purported leaked doc authenticity authority, their tweets are far more dishonest than underlying analysis. Targets low info voters IMO.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattaknox @BiellaColeman
How does a tweet abt the provenance of the documents--one being discussed on all sides--affect outcome of actual vote?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Absolutely agree WL's takes on docs is often dubious. That's different than equating them w/publishing them, which I'm seeing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
But I also see lots of Dems w/dubious takes, such as on Trump conspiracy theories. They're entitled to speak.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Trend Micro & Flashpoint have now traced
#MacronLeaks hack to Russian-backed Fancy Bear/Pawn Storm cyber espionage group.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rover276 @emptywheel and


Sure! People that believe a professional hacker would leave his trace are clueless how hackers work.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It is a fair point to ask that people explain why metadata left intentionally here and w/Guccifer leaks. Doesn't mean it wasn't GRU.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.