Q: Am I missing where Wikileaks published Macron emails? If not, what is different fr their link to and discussion of emails & others'?
Not sure I understand how that one does. Perhaps earlier claim it hadn't found any fakes is.
-
-
As a purported leaked doc authenticity authority, their tweets are far more dishonest than underlying analysis. Targets low info voters IMO.
-
How does a tweet abt the provenance of the documents--one being discussed on all sides--affect outcome of actual vote?
-
Absolutely agree WL's takes on docs is often dubious. That's different than equating them w/publishing them, which I'm seeing.
-
But I also see lots of Dems w/dubious takes, such as on Trump conspiracy theories. They're entitled to speak.
-
Trend Micro & Flashpoint have now traced
#MacronLeaks hack to Russian-backed Fancy Bear/Pawn Storm cyber espionage group. -
I'm not saying it's not GRU. I'm saying there are a lot of favored conspiracy theories abt Russia too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So to answer you orig question, there isn't necessarily a distinction between them and any other propagandists.
-
Well, I'm seeing some stupid takes on part of pro-Macron people, too. So long as we agree that stupid takes are different than publishing
-
I would add that the original reporting on metadata in DNC docs was crappy, seeing same hasty takes now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They've done stuff like this in high leverage spots before. Always spun against opponent of far right candidate.https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786885222830923776 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.