You just said below "email addresses and identifiers", but now you say "content"? MAKE. UP. YOUR. MIND.
-
-
Replying to @okanogen2010 @Bwonk_Bwonk and
You're unfamiliar with how databases work?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @okanogen2010 and
Empty, your thread has personal deprecating comments that r not helpful (Kremlinesque) when words could be better spent in clarification.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bwonk_Bwonk @okanogen2010 and
It's not Kremlinesque to call anything you don't understand provokatsiya?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @okanogen2010 and
Gosh, I understand metadata v content. I do understand provokatsiya and it's anti-Kremlin to call it out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bwonk_Bwonk @okanogen2010 and
emptywheel Retweeted Radio Free Pennsylvania T
This tweet shows you don't understand this.https://twitter.com/Bwonk_Bwonk/status/860542812433121280 …
emptywheel added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Bwonk_Bwonk and
It's not about unmasking. It's about warrantless access to raw data, directly to the communications.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Bwonk_Bwonk and
So, what you are objecting to is FBI/CIA/NSA access to actual content of US citizen conversations with monitored foreign actors? Correct?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @okanogen2010 @Bwonk_Bwonk and
What is your definition of "monitored foreign actor"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nope. That's not what I'm talking about. That's tradition FISA, for which probable cause has been shown.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.