Your practice is to not link through before you respond to a tweet?
-
-
Yes, Paul is being inflammatory. But yes, you are totally incorrect abt unmasking and back door searches.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Loose terminology leads to fuzzy concepts leads to *more* fake news. Want justice and accuracy both sides of aisle.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Great! Then journalists should not affirmatively misinform when they try to refute inflammatory language.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Bwonk_Bwonk and
And so should you. Rand clearly was implying that warrantless "wiretapping" already targeted Trump, and "other" candidates.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @okanogen2010 @Bwonk_Bwonk and
Rand was linking through to piece about back door searches. I absolutely agree it is inflammatory to call that "wiretapping," even w/quotes
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @okanogen2010 and
But it is also the case that claim Gov needs warrant to do what Paul linked to (and thereby was talking about) is utterly false.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @okanogen2010 and
paul elledge Retweeted John Schindler
A good thread by someone that would know, not fuzzy conspiracy stuff.https://twitter.com/20committee/status/860466491380170752 …
paul elledge added,
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @microbear1 @okanogen2010 and
Yeah. Sorry. It's wrong. What Circa was referring to was back door searches. They involve no masking in the first place. Zero. None. Nada.
3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @microbear1 and
That is the reason they are so problematic. Bc if FBI starts investigating Mike Flynn, they get all the FISA content they have w/o warrant.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
And THEIR numbers of doing so are so high they're not even in the underlying report.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.