Just as an example, we can be virtually certain they "surveilled' Mike Flynn in that way. Bc doing so is routine. Same w/Manafort.
-
-
But Paul linked to an unmasking article and was talking about warrantless wiretapping on candidates. So he is the one making false claims.
-
Look. I followed your link to your article as directed (you are welcome for the click), and it describes meta-data collection and use. 1/
-
Metadata collection and use IS NOT WARRANTLESS WIRETAPPING. It is problematic, I grant, but not what Senator Tinfoil was talking about.
-
No you're completely wrong. It discusses warrantless access to content FBI does so much they can't count it.
-
This, btw, is why it is so important for journos in this beat not to make false claims.
-
Exactly what content are you accusing them of accessing without a warrant. Please be clear.
-
I'm not ACCUSING. I'm telling you what PCLOB, ODNI, and other official docs have STATED they collect.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
A good thread by someone that would know, not fuzzy conspiracy stuff.https://twitter.com/20committee/status/860466491380170752 …
-
Yeah. Sorry. It's wrong. What Circa was referring to was back door searches. They involve no masking in the first place. Zero. None. Nada.
-
So, what you clumsily call "backdoor searches", is just IC review of previously recorded convos btwn US citizens & targeted fgn agents? 1/
-
If that is what you mean, then it is just so obvious that no wonder it isn't clear. 4/4
-
So no, this is not, as you keep insisting, just reviewing data as it comes in and then masking it. Masking is completely uninvolved.
-
I just freaking said that.
-
Again, EVEN JIM COMEY said discussing masking, EVER, in this context is meaningless. It is.
-
I understand now your entire purpose is fear-mongering.
- 29 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.