Honest question: How is publishing scientifically bogus columns in nation's most esteemed paper different than fake news?
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
As someone who is internationally interviewed on fake-news: 1. Published as opinion, not a story. 2. Distinctly diff signature than trad fn.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OmnivoreBlog
As someone who is ALSO internationally interviewed on fake news & w/related PhD. Nope. "Fake News" gets treated as an outlet.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @OmnivoreBlog @emptywheel
I mean, the vast majority of what we think of as traditional fn (either Russia prop, Macedonian teenagers, American trolling)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @OmnivoreBlog
There has always been a problem with what "we" think of as fake news. It always involves a selective application of standards.
8:45 AM - 30 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.