Honest question: How is publishing scientifically bogus columns in nation's most esteemed paper different than fake news?
-
-
Meaning what, exactly?
-
I mean, the vast majority of what we think of as traditional fn (either Russia prop, Macedonian teenagers, American trolling)
-
There has always been a problem with what "we" think of as fake news. It always involves a selective application of standards.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.