Honest question: How is publishing scientifically bogus columns in nation's most esteemed paper different than fake news?
-
-
Seeing conservative Twitter, they just seem to be happy the left is upset. Even the non-Trump GOP runs on nothing more than spite these days
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Always delighted when people reinforce my view.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Fake" is a lie, ie, *intentional* falsehood. I also think "fake news" is backed by a marketing campaign. Re: Stephens - if he believes …
-
the risk analysis he published, he needs to stop right there and go back to school. Dangerously incompetent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.