I think most IT folks would admit "technically impossible" often means "it would be a big hassle to do it that way."
-
-
Replying to @normative
FISC and PCLOB may both have been a little too prepared to accept "technically necessary" without asking "ok, but what if you couldn't?"
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @normative
...at which point they might discover the answer is "well, we can still do it another way, but it's 3% less efficient & more expensive"
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @normative
Given that possiblity seems like PCLOB really should have had more info before saying it would "substantially" mess up to/from Upstream
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JakeLaperruque @normative
It's also possible the key functions they would have lost then are now being done by CISA and 12333.
2:19 PM - 28 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.