So the pros that you have such faith in are innocent but Assange is guilty for doing precisely the same thing? Curious.
OK, help me out do you: 1) Have evidence abt WL & DNC hack that IC doesn't have? 2) Make stuff up about WL w/o evidence? Which one is it?
-
-
Well, unlike Fox News, he hasn't been caught publishing fake news. Stuff like that? Again, this is not "aplogy" for Assange. it's for law.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I get that you have a difficult time separating your hatred (totally fair!) for Assange from principles abt prosecution.
-
From that I assume you support Jeff Sessions having the ability to prosecute others for speech he finds objectionable, even on Twitter?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You're arguing, very loudly, in favor right now. You just don't understand that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.