FBI and NSA have some explaining to do...https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/855153522865733633 …
-
-
Replying to @Robyn_Greene
Right? But it can't be a BIG deal because there was no amicus involved.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I don't know anyone who thought the amicus would be a panacea. Esp the more toothless version of FISC reform that passed.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Robyn_Greene
Sure. But I trust (!!!) they'd bring one if it were big deal from the start. I'm wondering if it pertains to attempt to get a count of USPs
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @Robyn_Greene
An item that doesn't raise legal questions but creates logistical hurdles like that would make sense. NSA & ODNI def owe an explanation
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque @Robyn_Greene
My WAGs: 1) attempt to find some way to count USPs 2) how to deal w/past overcollex 3) lang responding to # of USP hits on criminal searches
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Also if there were a persistent problem (like the atty-client ones at FBI) FISC may have held things up. Most guesses I can think of are FBI
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.