Odd story here—timeline seems off, as alleged docs were circulated when leaking op was already in execution phasehttp://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN17L2N3?utm_content=bufferce37b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer …
The G2.0 story ALSO doesn't make sense as told. But the GRU collects and FSB observes ALSO conflicts with the facts. It's a mess.
-
-
All we have is infrastructure ties to connect the dots on attribution. Which is based on prior observation.
-
So the forensics say Cozy
was in place for over a year, and Fancy
was there starting in March. But Fancy was also Noisy. -
I've been trying to sort through all the public data for months and honestly all it tells me is DNC and DCCC were hit with mult. tools.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True. Attribution is for shit.
-
didn't Lincoln say that?
-
I believe he did.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.