How do you figure?
Also, take a step back: who decides what is "crosses the line" in spying? We don't (or haven't) adhered to many of the norms we espouse.
-
-
I guess when we can't settle by law we settle by norms. I'm sure there's game theory and all sorts of considerations I don't understand.
-
Right: but we don't adhere to norms we say we do. And there aren't pre-existing norms. Certainly leaking non-hacked docs to press "normal"
-
That's what's interesting. The hacking wasn't violation of norms. The leaking was. Association with election was aggravating circumstance.
-
Yeah, I just don't agree those norms exist. We like to SAY they exist. But certainly non-cyber stolen info leaking normatively acceptable.
-
Inclined to agree. Every time we thought there was a redline in this space North Korea, Iran, or Russia has rolled across it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.