True, though in light of the legislative history that seems... not like what was intended. Significant if the FISC considers that enough.https://twitter.com/charlie_savage/status/851950221609373696 …
-
-
-
Replying to @charlie_savage @normative
OTOH, I don't see a criminal element in the necessary findings for a FAA Section 703 order (USP outside US)pic.twitter.com/311OcRZLlA
2 replies 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @normative
1) THEY DON'T USE 703, DAMNIT. THEY USE 704. 2) It'd be a 705b anyway, for use in and outside.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @normative
on 1) ok but still no crim element in the four corners of 704 on 2) maybe, unless the lack of crim element mattered?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlie_savage @normative
Right. 704, if they could use it is even easier, I think, than 703. But he was definitely in and out of the country, meeting w/Russians.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Unless they were ONLY interested in his meetings overseas.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
(Sorry to get grumpy abt 704, but as I understand it we can't acknowledge that publicly bc of dumb politics in Senate.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.