@Susan_Hennessey @emptywheel 1) A couple points about HPSCI Chairman @DevinNunes' 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 recusal: Never in my experience has a...
-
-
2) Cont'd...formal allegation of leaking classified information allow the alleged to continue to maintain access to classified information.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
3) In
@DevinNunes' case, he still maintains access to the entire collection of US classified information and operations as HPSCI Chairman.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
4) In my experience, formal allegations of leaking classified information cause the removal of access to 𝘈𝘕𝘠 classified information.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
5) Additionally, why is this even an 𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘴 matter for the House Committee on Ethics instead of a 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 matter for the FBI/DOJ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
As to the House, b/c those are its rules; as to DOJ/FBI, they can investigate at the same time, though the cmte may suspend if requested.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I do get that House has its rules, but don't get how those rules should be primary method for disposition of alleged classified info leak.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You need to have it bc of Speech and Debate. Even when FBI gets involved Congress can pretty much refuse cooperation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Which happened in Sterling case. SSCI staffer was, from the start, primary suspect. He never fully cooperated. Still working in Senate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.