No, her objections are bullshit. I say US members of congress were unmasked, not Israelis, for example.
-
-
Replying to @EliLake @SciencePartisan
EVEN if that were issue (rather than my shorthand & facts) that is one of 5, not counting
@JakeLaperruque's other point. That's not hysteria4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
U missed the entire argument. The standard for Rice was whether it helped her understand report
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Did you REPORT that it didn't? Nope. Did you MISS 6 other GAPING holes in your little piece? Yup? Try harder Eli. You can do better.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Are you really this dense? Please read the actual column. This is unbelievable.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Show me Eli. Show me where you REPORTED.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My point is that standard for unmasking could apply to almost any US person.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Or, if like Erik Prince, a US person creates entire armies for adversarial nations, they, too, will be spied on.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
What are you talking about? This is just nonsense babble from you at this point
6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
"We can search for US comms acquired w/o warrant" Nunes: Cool "Also unmask Americans if it's FI" Ok "Even if it's a Trump person" WHAT?!?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Actually, Nunes is ACTUALLY saying you can't COLLECT on Trump persons or those who speak w/Bibi Netanyahu, even if of intelligence interest.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.